Rosemont Waterline PPC Survey
PIMA PINEAPPLE CACTUS SURVEY
OF THE PROPOSED ROSEMONT PROJECT WATERLINE ALIGNMENT
PREPARED FOR: Rosemont Copper Company
PREPARED BY: WestLand Resources, Inc.
DATE: March 11, 2009
PROJECT NO. 1049.10 350 350
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. SPECIES STATUS
3. METHODS
4. SURVEY AREA DESCRIPTION
5. PIMA PINEAPPLE CACTUS SURVEY RESULTS.
6. LITERATURE CITED
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. PPC Location Map
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Locations and Notes for PPC found during the Rosemont Waterline Survey, October 2008
1. INTRODUCTION
WestLand Resources, Inc. (WestLand) was retained by Rosemont Copper Company to survey for Pima
pineapple cactus (PPC; Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina) along an approximately 15.77-mile-long
proposed waterline as part of the proposed Rosemont Project. A 120-ft wide area was surveyed along the
proposed waterline extending from just east of the Town of Sahuarita to the western base of the Santa Rita Mountains1 (the Survey Area, Figure 1).
2. SPECIES STATUS
The PPC is listed by US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered (58 FR 49875, 09-23-93)
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). There is no designated critical habitat or proposed critical
habitat for PPC.
The PPC is reported to occur from 2,300 to 4,500 feet (700 to 1,400 meters) in elevation (EES 1992) in
Pima and Santa Cruz counties, southern Arizona, and northern Sonora, Mexico (Benson 1982; Phillips
and Phillips 1981). The known range of PPC in Arizona is from the Baboquivari Mountains east to the
Santa Rita Mountains in Santa Cruz and Pima counties. Most of the known locations are in the Altar and
Avra valleys, Santa Cruz River Basin, and the alluvial fans of the Sierrita, Santa Rita, Empire, Coyote,
and Pajarito mountains (AGFD 2001), and two documented populations are known in northern Sonora,
Mexico (USFWS 1998). The PPC does not occur in mountainous areas including the Sierrita,
Baboquivari, Santa Rita, Quinlan, Coyote, Atascosa, Pajarito, Cerro Colorado, San Luis, and Tumacacori
mountains. The species has not been found in riparian areas such as the Santa Cruz River floodplain or
the Sonoita Creek drainage of Arizona (58 FR 49875).
The PPC is generally found on Sonoran desertscrub alluvial fans and semidesert grassland ridges
(Mills 1991). In rolling hilly habitats, the species has been found mainly on flat hilltops and rarely on
slopes or in drainages separating the hilltops. Although PPC occur most commonly on flat ridgetops with
little (less than 10 percent) slope, Mills (1991) reported some plants on south-facing hillsides (mid to
upper slope) with slopes up to 15 percent (Mills 1991). Mills (1991) also reported that they found no
plants on north-facing slopes of any significant size, despite intensive surveys. However, PPC have been
found on a northern slope with approximately 25 percent grade (S. Hart, WestLand Resources, Inc.,
personal observation) but this is uncommon. Substrate composition is likely an important factor in
determining PPC distribution, although we are not aware of any studies that conclusively identify
important substrate factors. Substrates in which PPC occur are described as rocky to sandy or silty soils in
alluvial valleys or on shallow-sloped (less than 10 percent grade) hillsides (Mills 1991) and White House
sandy loam series (Roller 1996). They are not known to occur in very sandy or very rocky soils, in deeper
soils along drainages, or in soils with high clay content (Mills 1991).
______________________________________
1 Crossing T17S, R14E, Sections 17, 20, 21, and borders of Sections 22/27, 23/26, and 24/25; T17S, R15E, borders of Sections
30/31, 29/32, 28/33, 27/34 and 34/35; and T18S, R15E, borders of Sections 2/3, 10/11, and 14/15, and Section 23, Gila and Salt
River Meridian

3. METHODS
The survey followed guidelines set forth in the USFWS document entitled Pima Pineapple Cactus 3 Tier
Survey Methods (Roller 1996). Surveyors walked transects approximately 15 feet apart to attain
100 percent coverage of the Survey Area. A single, 100-percent coverage survey was completed between
October 7 and 21, 2008, by a WestLand field crew with extensive PPC survey experience.
The boundaries of the Survey Area were entered into a Trimble GPS unit with sub-centimeter accuracy.
The unit was carried in the field to guide the survey. In places, the Survey Area straddled fencing along
the boundary of private property. In these situations, the private property was not included in the survey
but the survey width remained 120 feet, with the fence becoming one boundary.
UTM coordinates (in NAD 27) of all PPC found were entered into the Trimble unit. PPC were tagged
with a unique number and the number of stems and general health of each plant was recorded.
4. SURVEY AREA DESCRIPTION
The Survey Area is located mainly on alluvium on the west side of the Santa Rita Mountains. The Survey
Area passes through undeveloped lands, except for short stretches with residences in a rural setting on one
side of the alignment (Figure 2). The Survey Area included dirt roadways over much of its length.
Jackson (1989) mapped the geomorphological units that the Survey Area crosses. The western
approximately 7 miles of the Survey Area are generally planar with a gentle but gradually increasing
upward slope to the east. This section starts on late Pleistocene–early Holocene soils at the west end,
moving east over a mosaic of middle and late Pleistocene through Holocene soils. The next 3.5 miles
continue east onto a wide alluvial fan of early Pleistocene (older) origin spilling out of Sycamore Canyon
in the Santa Rita Mountains. This surface is easily distinguished in aerial color photography (shown
reddish in color) and typified by northwest-trending, steep-sloped ridges and an increasingly steep overall
gradient as the base of the Santa Rita Mountains are approached (Figure 2). The Survey Area then turns
south and continues on the same surface for close to 2 miles, then for more than 1.5 miles crosses a
surface with a similar overall slope and age, but of different origin and with shallower cut ridges. The
final approximately 1.75 miles of the Survey Area crosses a small, outlying hill of the mountains
protruding from the alluvial material, ending in a steep drainage at the base of the mountains. The low
point of the Survey Area is approximately 2,730 feet above mean sea level (amsl) near its western end,
and the high point is approximately 4,500 feet amsl near its eastern end.
On Brown’s (1994) map of biotic communities of the southwest, the west end of the Survey Area is near
the boundary of the semidesert grassland and Arizona upland subdivision of the Sonoran desertscrub
biotic communities, crossing eastward within semidesert grassland. The Survey Area crosses through

various vegetation communities, including mesquite–cactus scrub with more Sonoran desertscrub influence; creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) flats; relatively densely vegetated xeroriparian areas with velvet mesquite (Prosopis velutina), blue palo verde (Parkinsonia florida), whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta), and other shrubs; and areas that were likely typical semidesert grassland decades ago, but now support more mesquite, soaptree yucca (Yucca elata), and many species of shrubs and sub-shrubs.
5. PIMA PINEAPPLE CACTUS SURVEY RESULTS
The 120-ft-wide, 15.77-mile-long Survey Area covers approximately 229 acres. WestLand mapped,
tagged, and recorded data on the 35 live PPC that were found during the survey effort. Distribution of the
PPC was not uniform along the Survey Area. A cluster consisting of 16 live PPC and two dead PPC was
found along the westernmost portion of the Survey Area (Figure 2). Soils within this westernmost portion
are of late Pleistocene to early Holocene origin. Approximately 6.5 miles to the east of the first cluster, a
group of 5 PPC was found on middle Pleistocene soils just east of the intersection of Camino de Aurelia
and South Kolb Road (Figure 2). The other 14 PPC were found dispersed over approximately 2.5 miles of
early Pleistocene soils within the Sycamore Canyon alluvial fan, where the alignment makes its final turn
to the south (Figure 2). The gaps where no PPC were found are notable, including approximately
6.5 miles between the western and middle clusters, 1.5 miles from the middle cluster to the first PPC on
the Sycamore Canyon fan, and the final southeastern 3.5 miles of the Survey Area (Figure 2).
The UTM coordinates, in NAD 27, of all live PPC found during the survey are provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Locations and Notes for PPC found during the Rosemont Waterline Survey, October 2008
PPC Tag No. |
UTM Coordinated (NAD27) |
Notes |
|
Easting |
Northing |
||
1 |
506158 |
3533168 |
No pups, healthy |
2 |
506153 |
3533187 |
2 main stems, no pups, healthy |
3 |
506152 |
3533475 |
4 pups, 2 fruits, healthy |
4 |
506152 |
3533480 |
4 pups, healthy |
5 |
506149 |
3533481 |
2 healthy main stems, 4 pups (3 dead) |
6 |
506131 |
3533489 |
5 pups, healthy |
7 |
506121 |
3533499 |
Dead main stem, 6 pups |
8 |
506117 |
3533501 |
No pups, healthy |
9 |
506140 |
3533444 |
No pups, 1 fruit, healthy |
10 |
506133 |
3533261 |
10 pups, healthy |
11 |
506144 |
3533705 |
2 fruits, unhealthy |
12 |
506121 |
3533690 |
Main stem unhealthy, 4 pups |
13 |
506128 |
3533570 |
No pups, healthy |
14 |
506119 |
3533561 |
No pups, healthy |
15 |
506113 |
3533565 |
1 healthy stem, 1 dead stem |
16 |
506144 |
3533550 |
Main stem dead, 3 pups |
17 |
515453 |
3531336 |
no pups; healthy |
18 |
515399 |
3531335 |
1 pup; healthy |
19 |
515281 |
3531349 |
|
20 |
515212 |
3531334 |
no pups |
21 |
515211 |
3531335 |
7 pups |
22 |
519923 |
3531270 |
4 stems 1 dead 3 fruit healthy |
23 |
519395 |
3531340 |
7 pups; fair health |
24 |
519121 |
3531347 |
2 pups; healthy; 1 fruit |
25 |
518874 |
3531346 |
2 pups; healthy; 2 dry fruit remnants |
26 |
518842 |
3531336 |
8 pups; healthy |
27 |
518412 |
3531347 |
0 pups; healthy |
28 |
518293 |
3531339 |
main stem dead; 6 pups; healthy |
29 |
518143 |
3531316 |
26 pups; healthy; 2 dry-partial fruit; 3 ripe fruit |
30 |
519283 |
3531321 |
3 pups; healthy |
31 |
519409 |
3531322 |
0 pups; healthy |
32 |
519763 |
3531315 |
3 pups healthy 3 fruits |
33 |
519944 |
3529983 |
4 stems 2 dead 6 pups |
34 |
519905 |
3529206 |
3 pups; healthy |
35 |
519938 |
3530817 |
11 pups; healthy |
6. LITERATURE CITED
| Arizona Game and Fish Department. 2001. Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Unpublished abstract compiled and | |
| edited by the Heritage Data Management System, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ. Accessed May 12, 2008. | |
| Benson, L. 1982. The Cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford University Press. Stanford, California. | |
| Brown, D.E. (ed.). 1994. Biotic Communities: Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico. University of | |
| Utah Press, Salt Lake City. | |
| Ecosphere Environmental Services (EES). 1992. A Range Study of Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Final report | |
| prepared by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Phoenix, Arizona. | |
| Jackson, G. 1989. Surficial geologic maps of the northeastern, southeastern, and southwestern portions of the Tucson | |
| metropolitan area. Arizona Geological Survey, Open-File Report 89-2. Arizona Geological Survey, Tucson, AZ. |
|
| Mills, G.S. 1991. Miscellaneous notes on Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Unpublished report. U.S. Fish & Wildlife | |
| Service, Arizona Ecological Services Office, Phoenix, Arizona. | |
| Phillips, A.M., B.G. Phillips, and N. Brian. 1981. Status report: Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Office of | |
| Endangered Species, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Unpublished report. | |
| Roller, P.S. 1996. Distribution, growth and reproduction of Pima pineapple cactus (Coryphantha scheeri Kuntz var.. | |
| robustispina Schott). M.S. Thesis, University of Arizona | |
| Roller, P.S. 1996. Pima Pineapple Cactus 3-tier Survey Methods. Unpublished report. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. | |
| Phoenix, Arizona. | |
| US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Endangered and Threatened Species of Arizona. Ecological Services Field Office, | |
| Phoenix. 123 pp. | |
