Rosemont Waterline PPC Survey

 

pdf icon 508 KB

 

PIMA PINEAPPLE CACTUS SURVEY
OF THE PROPOSED ROSEMONT PROJECT WATERLINE ALIGNMENT


PREPARED FOR: Rosemont Copper Company

PREPARED BY: WestLand Resources, Inc.

DATE: March 11, 2009

PROJECT NO. 1049.10 350 350


 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION
2. SPECIES STATUS
3. METHODS
4. SURVEY AREA DESCRIPTION
5. PIMA PINEAPPLE CACTUS SURVEY RESULTS.
6. LITERATURE CITED


LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. PPC Location Map

LIST OF TABLES


Table 1. Locations and Notes for PPC found during the Rosemont Waterline Survey, October 2008


1. INTRODUCTION

WestLand Resources, Inc. (WestLand) was retained by Rosemont Copper Company to survey for Pima pineapple cactus (PPC; Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina) along an approximately 15.77-mile-long proposed waterline as part of the proposed Rosemont Project. A 120-ft wide area was surveyed along the

proposed waterline extending from just east of the Town of Sahuarita to the western base of the Santa Rita Mountains1 (the Survey Area, Figure 1).


2. SPECIES STATUS

The PPC is listed by US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered (58 FR 49875, 09-23-93) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). There is no designated critical habitat or proposed critical habitat for PPC.

The PPC is reported to occur from 2,300 to 4,500 feet (700 to 1,400 meters) in elevation (EES 1992) in Pima and Santa Cruz counties, southern Arizona, and northern Sonora, Mexico (Benson 1982; Phillips and Phillips 1981). The known range of PPC in Arizona is from the Baboquivari Mountains east to the Santa Rita Mountains in Santa Cruz and Pima counties. Most of the known locations are in the Altar and Avra valleys, Santa Cruz River Basin, and the alluvial fans of the Sierrita, Santa Rita, Empire, Coyote, and Pajarito mountains (AGFD 2001), and two documented populations are known in northern Sonora, Mexico (USFWS 1998). The PPC does not occur in mountainous areas including the Sierrita, Baboquivari, Santa Rita, Quinlan, Coyote, Atascosa, Pajarito, Cerro Colorado, San Luis, and Tumacacori mountains. The species has not been found in riparian areas such as the Santa Cruz River floodplain or the Sonoita Creek drainage of Arizona (58 FR 49875).

The PPC is generally found on Sonoran desertscrub alluvial fans and semidesert grassland ridges (Mills 1991). In rolling hilly habitats, the species has been found mainly on flat hilltops and rarely on slopes or in drainages separating the hilltops. Although PPC occur most commonly on flat ridgetops with little (less than 10 percent) slope, Mills (1991) reported some plants on south-facing hillsides (mid to upper slope) with slopes up to 15 percent (Mills 1991). Mills (1991) also reported that they found no plants on north-facing slopes of any significant size, despite intensive surveys. However, PPC have been found on a northern slope with approximately 25 percent grade (S. Hart, WestLand Resources, Inc., personal observation) but this is uncommon. Substrate composition is likely an important factor in determining PPC distribution, although we are not aware of any studies that conclusively identify important substrate factors. Substrates in which PPC occur are described as rocky to sandy or silty soils in alluvial valleys or on shallow-sloped (less than 10 percent grade) hillsides (Mills 1991) and White House sandy loam series (Roller 1996). They are not known to occur in very sandy or very rocky soils, in deeper soils along drainages, or in soils with high clay content (Mills 1991).

______________________________________
1 Crossing T17S, R14E, Sections 17, 20, 21, and borders of Sections 22/27, 23/26, and 24/25; T17S, R15E, borders of Sections 30/31, 29/32, 28/33, 27/34 and 34/35; and T18S, R15E, borders of Sections 2/3, 10/11, and 14/15, and Section 23, Gila and Salt River Meridian

3. METHODS

The survey followed guidelines set forth in the USFWS document entitled Pima Pineapple Cactus 3 Tier Survey Methods (Roller 1996). Surveyors walked transects approximately 15 feet apart to attain 100 percent coverage of the Survey Area. A single, 100-percent coverage survey was completed between October 7 and 21, 2008, by a WestLand field crew with extensive PPC survey experience.

The boundaries of the Survey Area were entered into a Trimble GPS unit with sub-centimeter accuracy. The unit was carried in the field to guide the survey. In places, the Survey Area straddled fencing along the boundary of private property. In these situations, the private property was not included in the survey but the survey width remained 120 feet, with the fence becoming one boundary.

UTM coordinates (in NAD 27) of all PPC found were entered into the Trimble unit. PPC were tagged with a unique number and the number of stems and general health of each plant was recorded.


4. SURVEY AREA DESCRIPTION

The Survey Area is located mainly on alluvium on the west side of the Santa Rita Mountains. The Survey Area passes through undeveloped lands, except for short stretches with residences in a rural setting on one side of the alignment (Figure 2). The Survey Area included dirt roadways over much of its length. Jackson (1989) mapped the geomorphological units that the Survey Area crosses. The western approximately 7 miles of the Survey Area are generally planar with a gentle but gradually increasing upward slope to the east. This section starts on late Pleistocene–early Holocene soils at the west end, moving east over a mosaic of middle and late Pleistocene through Holocene soils. The next 3.5 miles continue east onto a wide alluvial fan of early Pleistocene (older) origin spilling out of Sycamore Canyon in the Santa Rita Mountains. This surface is easily distinguished in aerial color photography (shown reddish in color) and typified by northwest-trending, steep-sloped ridges and an increasingly steep overall gradient as the base of the Santa Rita Mountains are approached (Figure 2). The Survey Area then turns south and continues on the same surface for close to 2 miles, then for more than 1.5 miles crosses a surface with a similar overall slope and age, but of different origin and with shallower cut ridges. The final approximately 1.75 miles of the Survey Area crosses a small, outlying hill of the mountains protruding from the alluvial material, ending in a steep drainage at the base of the mountains. The low point of the Survey Area is approximately 2,730 feet above mean sea level (amsl) near its western end, and the high point is approximately 4,500 feet amsl near its eastern end.

On Brown’s (1994) map of biotic communities of the southwest, the west end of the Survey Area is near the boundary of the semidesert grassland and Arizona upland subdivision of the Sonoran desertscrub biotic communities, crossing eastward within semidesert grassland. The Survey Area crosses through

various vegetation communities, including mesquite–cactus scrub with more Sonoran desertscrub influence; creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) flats; relatively densely vegetated xeroriparian areas with velvet mesquite (Prosopis velutina), blue palo verde (Parkinsonia florida), whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta), and other shrubs; and areas that were likely typical semidesert grassland decades ago, but now support more mesquite, soaptree yucca (Yucca elata), and many species of shrubs and sub-shrubs.


5. PIMA PINEAPPLE CACTUS SURVEY RESULTS

The 120-ft-wide, 15.77-mile-long Survey Area covers approximately 229 acres. WestLand mapped, tagged, and recorded data on the 35 live PPC that were found during the survey effort. Distribution of the PPC was not uniform along the Survey Area. A cluster consisting of 16 live PPC and two dead PPC was found along the westernmost portion of the Survey Area (Figure 2). Soils within this westernmost portion are of late Pleistocene to early Holocene origin. Approximately 6.5 miles to the east of the first cluster, a group of 5 PPC was found on middle Pleistocene soils just east of the intersection of Camino de Aurelia and South Kolb Road (Figure 2). The other 14 PPC were found dispersed over approximately 2.5 miles of early Pleistocene soils within the Sycamore Canyon alluvial fan, where the alignment makes its final turn to the south (Figure 2). The gaps where no PPC were found are notable, including approximately 6.5 miles between the western and middle clusters, 1.5 miles from the middle cluster to the first PPC on the Sycamore Canyon fan, and the final southeastern 3.5 miles of the Survey Area (Figure 2). The UTM coordinates, in NAD 27, of all live PPC found during the survey are provided in Table 1.


Table 1. Locations and Notes for PPC found during the Rosemont Waterline Survey, October 2008

PPC Tag No.
UTM Coordinated (NAD27)
Notes
Easting
Northing
1
506158
3533168
No pups, healthy
2
506153
3533187
2 main stems, no pups, healthy
3
506152
3533475
4 pups, 2 fruits, healthy
4
506152
3533480
4 pups, healthy
5
506149
3533481
2 healthy main stems, 4 pups (3 dead)
6
506131
3533489
5 pups, healthy
7
506121
3533499
Dead main stem, 6 pups
8
506117
3533501
No pups, healthy
9
506140
3533444
No pups, 1 fruit, healthy
10
506133
3533261
10 pups, healthy
11
506144
3533705
2 fruits, unhealthy
12
506121
3533690
Main stem unhealthy, 4 pups
13
506128
3533570
No pups, healthy
14
506119
3533561
No pups, healthy
15
506113
3533565
1 healthy stem, 1 dead stem
16
506144
3533550
Main stem dead, 3 pups
17
515453
3531336
no pups; healthy
18
515399
3531335
1 pup; healthy
19
515281
3531349
 
20
515212
3531334
no pups
21
515211
3531335
7 pups
22
519923
3531270
4 stems 1 dead 3 fruit healthy
23
519395
3531340
7 pups; fair health
24
519121
3531347
2 pups; healthy; 1 fruit
25
518874
3531346
2 pups; healthy; 2 dry fruit remnants
26
518842
3531336
8 pups; healthy
27
518412
3531347
0 pups; healthy
28
518293
3531339
main stem dead; 6 pups; healthy
29
518143
3531316
26 pups; healthy; 2 dry-partial fruit; 3 ripe fruit
30
519283
3531321
3 pups; healthy
31
519409
3531322
0 pups; healthy
32
519763
3531315
3 pups healthy 3 fruits
33
519944
3529983
4 stems 2 dead 6 pups
34
519905
3529206
3 pups; healthy
35
519938
3530817
11 pups; healthy

 

6. LITERATURE CITED

Arizona Game and Fish Department. 2001. Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Unpublished abstract compiled and
  edited by the Heritage Data Management System, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ. Accessed May 12, 2008.
   
Benson, L. 1982. The Cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford University Press. Stanford, California.
   
Brown, D.E. (ed.). 1994. Biotic Communities: Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico. University of
  Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
   
Ecosphere Environmental Services (EES). 1992. A Range Study of Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Final report
  prepared by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Phoenix, Arizona.
   
Jackson, G. 1989. Surficial geologic maps of the northeastern, southeastern, and southwestern portions of the Tucson
  metropolitan area. Arizona Geological Survey, Open-File Report 89-2. Arizona
Geological Survey, Tucson, AZ.
   
Mills, G.S. 1991. Miscellaneous notes on Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Unpublished report. U.S. Fish & Wildlife
  Service, Arizona Ecological Services Office, Phoenix, Arizona.
   
Phillips, A.M., B.G. Phillips, and N. Brian. 1981. Status report: Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina. Office of
  Endangered Species, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Unpublished report.
   
Roller, P.S. 1996. Distribution, growth and reproduction of Pima pineapple cactus (Coryphantha scheeri Kuntz var..
  robustispina Schott). M.S. Thesis, University of Arizona
   
Roller, P.S. 1996. Pima Pineapple Cactus 3-tier Survey Methods. Unpublished report. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
  Phoenix, Arizona.
   
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Endangered and Threatened Species of Arizona. Ecological Services Field Office,
  Phoenix. 123 pp.