Rosemont Copper Project
Final Environmental Impact Statement complete
Documents posted on project website, objection period to begin Jan. 1
TUCSON, AZ (December 12, 2013) - The Coronado National Forest has announced the completion of the Rosemont Copper Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
The National Environmental Policy Act environmental analysis process was initiated for the Rosemont Copper Project in March of 2008, in response to a Mine Plan of Operations for an open-pit copper mine proposed for the Santa Rita Mountains southeast of Tucson, Arizona. The proposal was submitted by the Augusta Resource Corporation in 2007. The analysis process is now coming to a close.
On December 13, 2013, a Notice of Availability for the FEIS will be published in the Federal Register.
On December 31, a legal notice will be published in the newspaper of record, the Arizona Daily Star, which initiates the 45-day objection period beginning January 1, 2014.
When the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was released in October 2011, the associated documentation indicated that the upcoming decision would be subject to an administrative appeal process according to the Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR 215). This process allows people who submitted comments during the official comment period on the DEIS an opportunity to appeal the final decision after it is signed. However, on March 27, 2013, new regulations were released that apply to all Forest Service decisions on Environmental Assessments (EA) and EISs, including the Rosemont Copper Project.
The new regulations, found at 36 CFR 218, provide an opportunity for eligible individuals, non-governmental organizations, businesses, partnerships, state and local governments, and Indian Tribes to file an objection to a proposed project or activity before the final decision is signed. This allows these individuals and entities to have unresolved concerns regarding the final decision reviewed by a higher-level Forest Service official, called the reviewing officer, before the decision is made.
“We are pleased with this new rule,” said Coronado National Forest Supervisor Jim Upchurch. “We believe that moving to the new process will give the public the opportunity to more fully engage in the eventual outcome of this decision during the objection period.”
The 218 regulations allow individuals and entities who submitted timely, specific written comments about the proposed project during any designated opportunity for public comment, to file an objection to the proposed project (36 CFR 218.5). Those who commented on the Rosemont Copper Project during the scoping period in 2008, or during the comment period for the draft EIS in 2011-2012, have standing to object to the proposed project.
On December 31 the publication of the legal notice will initiate the objection process. Those who are eligible will have 45 days in which to review the documents and file an objection on the proposed project. Specific directions on how to file an objection are provided in 36 CFR 218.8 and will be included in the legal notice, and posted on the project website (www.RosemontEIS.us). Following the objection filing period, the Forest Service will have a 45-day review period, with the option for one 30-day extension. The total objection period has a statutory limit of 120 days following the legal notice commencing the objection process. At the end of this period, the reviewing officer will issue a written response to the objections which may include instructions to the responsible official to incorporate additional changes in the draft Record of Decision or to move forward with the project.
Interested parties are advised to be aware of the following information regarding the objection process:
- Objections will be subject to review by a “reviewing officer.” Because the responsible official for the Rosemont Copper Project is the Coronado National Forest Supervisor, the reviewing officer will be the Southwestern Regional Forester, Cal Joyner.
- The objection process may include an opportunity for the objector to meet with the reviewing officer and the responsible official, with the objective of having a dialogue about the objection issues and exploring opportunities for resolving the concerns expressed in the objection.
- The responsible official cannot sign the final decision until the reviewing officer has responded in writing to all pending objections, and the decision must be consistent with any instructions issued by the reviewing officer.
- There will be NO opportunity for additional administrative review or appeal of the final decision.
Further information on the 218 pre-decisional objection process can be found at